Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Stein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.

Although the rule is established in this department that an examination before trial will not ordinarily be granted in actions for tort (Shaw v. Samley Realty Co., Inc., 201 App. Div. 433), we think some part of the examination sought should have been allowed under the special circumstances which existed here.

The plaintiff employed the defendant, a plastic surgeon, to perform two operations on her breasts. She alleges that the operations were so negligently performed that they resulted in permanent disfigurement and excessive pain. To establish the allegation of negligence the plaintiff, by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Samley Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Kematjian v. Island Cab Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Landrau v. Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. Frank v. Otto Bernz Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. Goodman v. PrenticeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nomako v. AshtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. Tremblay v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API