Blue Mako, Inc. v. Minidis
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TILLEY, District Judge.
On December 21, 2006, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by Section 636.
Therefore, the Court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to remand (docket no. 15) is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss this action for lack of personal jurisdiction (docket no. 5) is denied as to Defendants Jim…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Speed Trac Technologies, Inc. v. Estes Express Lines, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Scholl v. Sagon RV Supercenter, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Creed v. Commonwealth of VirginiaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- AARP v. American Family Prepaid Legal Corp., Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.