Legal Opinion
Palomo v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided May 19, 2010No. 07-10-0181-CV, 07-10-0182-CV, 07-10-0183-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON ABATEMENT
2Per curiam
On February 25, 2010, in each referenced cause, pursuant to § 501.014(e) of the Texas Government Code, the trial court signed and entered an Order to Withdraw Inmate Funds 1 By the withdrawal notifications entered in each cause, the trial court directed the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division to withhold the following amounts: (1) $1,810.31 in cause number 18,223-B; (2) $616.50 in cause number 18,368-B; and (3) $616.50 in cause number 18,369-B. Appellant filed pro se notices of appeal on May 5, 2010, challenging the withdrawal notifications. While…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mayer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Harrell v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Johnson v. Tenth Judicial District Court of Appeals at WacoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Iacono v. Lyons, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by18 opinions
- Armstrong v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
- Billy Ray Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Billy Ray Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Javier Davila v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- Javier Davila v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.