Legal Opinion

Cardenas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 17, 2001No. 3D00-2616PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant below seeks a writ of habeas .corpus permitting belated appeals of two separate denials of post conviction relief. We grant the petition and adopt the candid and very helpful “argument” in the state’s response:

*1008Petitioner contends that the court/ clerk of court failed to inform him, on two separate occasions, of his right to appeal following the denial of his Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence and his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Ex. Q: 2-3). A review of the orders denying the post-conviction motion and the petition for habeas corpus indicate an absence of any language…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Shevin v. District Court of AppealSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Tate v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Williams v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ingram v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Figueredo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API