Stahl v. Mike Gordon's Seafood Restaurant
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Claimant appeals a workers’ compensation order which denied a claim for wage-loss benefits upon a finding that “there has been no compliance with the requirements of the statutes 440.19(1), 440.185(10), and 440.15(3)(b).” Claimant contends that the finding of non-compliance is not supported by material record evidence and should not preclude an otherwise valid wage-loss claim in the circumstances of this case. We agree and reverse the order appealed.
On the point in question the order contains recitations as follows, without other explanation of the apparently complex history of the claim:
*809A…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- GALL SILICA MIN. CO. v. SheffieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Deinema v. Pierpoint CondominiumsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Racz v. Chennault, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Turner v. Rinker MaterialsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993