Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1984No. A019462PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that foreign plaintiffs’ choice of California as the fomm state for litigation against corporate defendants whose principal places of business are in this state and who are alleged to have committed a tort in California which is the basis for plaintiffs’ claim, should not be disturbed, unless defendants establish that the balance of relevant factors weighs strongly in their favor. Absent such a showing, it is an abuse of discretion to grant a motion to dismiss such litigation on the basis of forum non conveniens.

*376Appellants, a group of British women and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ravelo Monegro v. RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Shewbrooks v. AC AND S. INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Cal-State Business Products & Services, Inc. v. RicohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API