Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Merchants & Bankers Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 27, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Polh District Court. — Hon. W. A. Spureier, Judge. Action on insurance policy. Judgment for tbe° defendant on a directed verdict, and tbe plaintiffs appeal. — ■

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

The policy was issued to Elliott February 9, 1895, covering a dwelling house, and contained a clause, making .the loss, if any, payable to the Iowa Central Building & Loan' Association, the mortgagee, as its interest might appear. The property was damaged by fire February 26th following, and on March 8th the defendant and Elliott entered into' an agreement to appraise the *40damages. The arbitrators chosen were unable to agree upon the amount of loss or an umpire, and one the twenty-ninth day of April, 1895, the defendant advised Elliott to “take notice that unless the appraisers agree as to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Platt v. Ætna InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Reid v. . McCrumNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Rosenfield v. ArrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Johnson v. American InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Briggs v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Theusen v. BryanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. Knox-Burchard Mercantile Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Olson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Herpolsheimer v. Citizens InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API