Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ryan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1986No. 2108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Judge:

Appellant was convicted of driving while intoxicated and of driving while under suspension. He contends that the trial court erred by dismissing his omnibus pre-trial motion, that 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731 is unconstitutional, that the court erred in failing to compel appellant’s admission into accelerated rehabilitative disposition (ARD), and that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction for driving while under suspension. The judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Appellant was arrested in the early morning hours of December 10, 1983 when police observed him erratically…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Reitz v. MealeySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Kesler v. Department of Public Safety of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. BetheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StrangesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. StrangesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API