Legal Opinion

A.P. and K.P., Parents of I.P., a disabled minor v. Clover Park School District

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 1, 2026No. 3:25-cv-05200Unknown

1Opinion

1 The Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT TACOMA 7 NO. 25-cv-5200-BJR A.P. and K.P., Parents of I,P., a disabled minor 8 ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS’ ATTORNEYS’ FEES 9 AND COSTS v. 10 CLOVER PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT, 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 This matter arises from an administrative due process claim under the Individuals with 15 Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”),

20 U.S.C. § 1400

et seq. After being awarded partial relief 16 by an administrative law judge at the conclusion of a due process…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API