Legal Opinion

United States v. Pinkston

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 2001No. CRIM. 1:CR-89-214-01, No. CIV. A. 1:CV-01-188PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

I. Introduction.

In July 1992, after he pled guilty to conspiring to distribute cocaine in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 846, this court sentenced the defendant, Julius John Pinkston, to 248 months in prison, later reduced to 198 months for substantial assistance in the prosecution of a codefendant.

Pinkston has filed a pro se motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his conviction and sentence, his first attempt at such postconviction relief. It is based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). 1

The motion presents the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. United States v. DuarteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re: Carnell TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. EnigweDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. In Re:Carnell TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  4. Turner v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API