Radium Mines, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, Judge.
For the purposes of the instant motions, the facts recited in the plaintiff’s petition will be taken as true. The plaintiff made a contract to purchase certain mining claims from third persons and paid substantial sums of money on the contract, with the expectation of mining uranium ore from those claims and selling it to the United States at a profit. The United States would not buy the plaintiff’s ore; the plaintiff was, as a consequence, unable to make its payments on its contract, and hence lost its property rights in the claims and lost the profits which it expected to make…
2Cited by29 opinions
- Army and Air Force Exchange Service v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- American Bankers Association v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Moda Health Plan, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.