Legal Opinion

Bingham Township v. RLTD Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2001No. Docket 115602PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a dispute between a township and proponents of a “rails to trails” recreational pathway that passes through the township. The Court of Appeals has twice found that the township’s zoning ordinance is preempted by laws that govern such pathways. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to circuit court for further proceedings.

i

This case concerns a former rail line that, roughly speaking, extends from Traverse City to Suttons Bay. The right of way in Leelanau County is about one hundred feet wide and about fifteen miles long. 1 Until the late 1970s, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Straus v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kent County Deputy Sheriffs Ass'n v. Kent County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bingham Township v. Rltd Railroad CorporationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Howell Township v. Rooto Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Bingham Township v. RLTD RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McGhee v. HelselMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. McGhee v. HelselMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. Shotwell v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Churella v. PIONEER STATE MUTUAL INS CO.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API