Legal Opinion

Rahr v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff was 'a resident of Manitowoc in the state of Wisconsin prior to December 31, 1933. On that date she became a resident of California and continued thereafter to reside in California. Pursuant to provisions of sec. 6, ch. 15, Laws of Wisconsin, 1935, effective March 27, 1935, an emergency relief tax of $1,078.10 was assessed against plaintiff on her net income for 1933, and notice of the assessment of this tax was duly sent to and reached plaintiff on July 1, 1935. Plaintiff objected to the assessment of the tax.on the ground that if valid as to residents…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Welch v. HenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Scobie v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Welch v. HenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Messinger v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wiegand v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Department of Revenue v. HowickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Department of Revenue v. HowickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Rahr v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Stafford Higgins Ind. v. City of Norwalk, No. Cv 94317449 (Mar. 10, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API