Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Sunrise Petroleum Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1935No. 5138PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Brought in the form of a simple action on open account for lumber sold and delivered, generally denied in the answer, the pleadings fail to disclose the real issue, which is whether or not defendant, by holding out H. A. Potter as its agent, rendered itself liable for timber bought by him that it did not order and did not receive.

Plaintiff operated a small sawmill on his farm, near Mansfield, in De Soto parish. Defendant is an oil and gas corporation, with headquarters at Houston, Tex., with Dr. C. R. Berry, president and treasurer, and ,H. A. Potter, vice president and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hebert v. ChampagneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  2. Haley v. WoodsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Burglass v. WrightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Whittington v. Town of GlenmoraLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baton Rouge Lumber Company v. GurneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. May Finance Co. v. NagyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Concrete Post-Tensioning v. Armco, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API