Legal Opinion

Diehl v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 13, 1967No. 67-108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant below appeals from his conviction of the crime of larceny of an automobile. The several contentions of the appellant having been considered in the light of the record and briefs, and no reversible error having been made to appear, we affirm. The fact that the defendant was not represented by counsel at the preliminary hearing is not ground for reversal. Di Bona v. State, Fla.App. 1960, 121 So.2d 192. No prejudice was shown to have resulted. The defendant subsequently pleaded not guilty, waived a jury and was tried before the court. The transcript of proceedings on preliminary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Di Bona v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Brookins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hammond v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Douglas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API