Legal Opinion

Schomer v. Smidt

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1980No. Civ. 22190PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KILGARIF, J. *

Cathleen Schomer filed a complaint on several grounds of intentional tort, including trespass, invasion of privacy, bat tery, intentional infliction of emotional stress, and slander. The principal action was for slander. The jury returned verdicts for $20,000 general damages and $16,000 punitive damages. The thrust of Schomer’s slander action was that Douglas Smidt uttered false and defamatory comments to her fellow employees which caused others to infer that Schomer was a lesbian. A codefendant, Conn Thrasher, upon motion at close of plaintiffs case, had judgment entered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Wetherbee v. United Ins. Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Vinson v. Linn-Mar Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Donovan v. FiumaraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Devlin v. Kearny Mesa AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Hobbs v. Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API