Legal Opinion

McLinden v. Schoeck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that Anne H. McLinden (plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). From our review of the record, we conclude that the affidavits of the treating physician and chiropractor submitted by plaintiffs in opposition to defendant’s motion were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact whether plaintiff sustained a serious…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. FosheeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Marszalek v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Denner v. MizgalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API