Legal Opinion
United States v. Tapor-Ideal Dairy Company
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 18, 1959No. Civ. A. 34074PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, District Judge.
This action is brought under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act (7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq., 7 C.F.R. 975).
The Government seeks a mandatory injunction to compel the defendant, Tapor-Ideal Dairy Company, to pay Dorset Cooperative Milk Co. $9,879.02 for milk which Tapor had purchased from Dorset. It is claimed Tapor’s failure to pay therefor constituted a violation of Order No. 75, promulgated under the Act and controlling the milk industry in the Cleveland, Ohio, area.
Tapor denied owing anything to Dorset. It claims that the account was disputed and that, on July 17,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rafael E. Bennett v. The Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Lamars Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Collier v. RothMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- United States v. MillsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1960
- United States v. Daylight Dairy Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.