Legal Opinion

Romo v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 5, 2007No. A07A2499PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

A jury found Raymond Romo guilty of sexual battery. Romo appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in admitting similar transaction evidence. He further argues that the trial court improperly allowed the State to amend the accusation. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

Viewed favorably to the jury’s verdict, 1 the evidence shows that the victim was a home health care worker assigned to assist Romo while he recovered from an injury to his arm. On the date of the incident, the victim prepared breakfast for Romo and took it to his bedroom. At Romo’s request, the victim agreed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Culver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Rowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Melton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Harmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Garvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Grier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API