Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. New York State Tax Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 21, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Levine, J.

Petitioners Sidney Rosenthal, deceased, and his wife were residents of the State of Florida during the period in question. On November 1, 1967, Rosenthal became a limited partner in the New York City brokerage firm of Emanuel, Deetjen & Company (Emanuel, Deetjen) with a capital investment of $100,000. At the same time, he and Emanuel, Deetjen entered into an “agreement subordinating account” under which petitioner loaned the firm $250,000 in securities for purposes of complying with rule 325 of the New York Stock Exchange. That rule limits the extension of credit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shearson v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  2. Matter of Shearson, Hammill & Co. v. State Tax Comm'n of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API