Legal Opinion
State of Hawaii v. Donald Trump
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 7, 2017No. 17-16426PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
We are asked to review the district court’s modified preliminary injunction, which enjoins the Government from enforcing Executive Order 13780 against (1) grandparents, grandchildren, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, and cousins of persons in the United States; and (2) refugees who have formal assurances from resettlement agencies or are in the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (“USRAP”) through the Lauten-berg Amendment.
For the reasons that follow, we conclude that in modifying the preliminary injunction to preserve the status quo, the district court…
3Cases cited21 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State of Washington v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Intl. Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- City of Chi. v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Doe v. TrumpDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- International Refugee Assistance Project v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Doe v. TrumpDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.