Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Rundel

Gleeson, J.,

In the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus, petitioner complains of certain irregularities in his arrest and trial. Petitioner’s contentions fall into two categories:

1. The sufficiency and credibility of the evidence on which he was convicted, and

2. An illegal arrest resulting in the introduction of illegally obtained evidence at his trial in violation of his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

We believe that neither category is subject to review by writ of habeas corpus. Errors involving the sufficiency and credibility of…