Legal Opinion

Molina v. Comision Reguladora del Mercado de Henequen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 17, 1918Published

On motion to strike out complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court -was delivered by

Swayze, J.

After the denial of the motion to dissolve the attachment in this case (91 N. J. L. 382), the defendant obtained leave to move to strike out the complaint, and to take testimony with that in view. This motion is now before me.

It is unnecessary to go into the evidence in detail. I am satisfied that on April 15th, 1915, the revolutionary authorities in Yucatan took proceedings against the property of the present plaintiff. These revolutionary authorities were acting under General Carranza; and their action was subsequently *39recognized by his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Underhill v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Robinson v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Ricaud v. American Metal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Burdick v. . FreemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API