Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson v. Felten

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1980No. 11087Published

1Dissent

Batjer, J.,

with whom Gunderson, J., agrees, dissenting:

I respectfully dissent from the holding of the majority. The maps and photographs in evidence as well as the testimony of August Kettenberg indicate at least the existence of an “unimproved, unpaved, diagonal path through the sagebrush approximately one car wide” leading from the “Foothill Road” to both parcels of appellant’s property. Kettenberg’s testimony indicates some use of the road by the general public for many *541years. As the Colorado Supreme Court said in Brown v. Jolley, 387 P.2d 278 (Colo. 1963), “A road may be a highway though…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central Pacific Railway Co. v. Alameda CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Cox v. Glenbrook CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Brown v. JolleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Anderson v. RichardsNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Keller v. MartiniNevada Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API