Legal Opinion

Gliklad v. Cherney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

*506In a prior appeal, we held that the promissory note contained a clause selecting New York as the forum (97 AD3d 401, 402 [1st Dept 2012]). The motion court correctly found that this ruling constituted law of the case, since defendant had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior appeal. The expert witness evidence that defendant proffered following that appeal in support of his claim that the note contained only a choice of law clause does not constitute “subsequent” or “new” evidence that was previously unavailable for the purpose of avoiding the law of the case doctrine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carmona v. MathissonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Clark Construction Corp. v. BLF Realty Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API