Legal Opinion

Martin v. Kearl

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 9, 1996No. 950743-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACKSON, Judge:

Clayton and Nita Kearl challenge the trial court’s ruling for Western Mortgage and Realty Company (Western)1 on Western’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

FACTS

The Kearls owned a parcel of land at 965 East New Hope Drive in Draper. In 1980, to secure a loan by Utah Firstbank (bank), they gave the bank a deed of trust encumbering the parcel. However, the property description on the deed of trust excluded a strip of land about twenty-five feet wide along the western side of the parcel (twenty-*92five-foot strip). The bank later foreclosed and bought the property as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Home Owners' Loan Corporation v. DudleyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Garfield CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Robertson v. BachmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bowen v. OlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Pueblo De Taos v. GusdorfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Salt Lake County v. Metro West Ready Mix, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API