Martin v. Kearl
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, Judge:
Clayton and Nita Kearl challenge the trial court’s ruling for Western Mortgage and Realty Company (Western)1 on Western’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.
FACTS
The Kearls owned a parcel of land at 965 East New Hope Drive in Draper. In 1980, to secure a loan by Utah Firstbank (bank), they gave the bank a deed of trust encumbering the parcel. However, the property description on the deed of trust excluded a strip of land about twenty-five feet wide along the western side of the parcel (twenty-*92five-foot strip). The bank later foreclosed and bought the property as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Home Owners' Loan Corporation v. DudleyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Garfield CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Robertson v. BachmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Bowen v. OlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Pueblo De Taos v. GusdorfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Salt Lake County v. Metro West Ready Mix, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004