Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate Property Corp. v. Hudson Coal Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 17, 1940Published

1DissentDore, J.

As the complaint fails to allege performance or excuse for non-performance, the motion for judgment on the pleadings should be granted on that ground alone, with leave, however, to plaintiff to replead.

Summary judgment, however, in defendant’s favor finally dismissing the complaint should not be granted until after a full disclosure of all the facts at trial. The terms of this lease relating to mining property in Pennsylvania are unique and neither side presents a controlling authority construing precisely similar terms of agreement either under Pennsylvania law (which would be an issue of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate Property Corp. v. Hudson Coal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Estate Property Corp. v. Hudson Coal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API