Legal Opinion

Young v. Matthiesen & Hegeler Zinc Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District; —heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. Geo. W. Stipp, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

This appeal is simply from an order of the court below refusing to allow the appellants to become parties defendant to a hill in chancery filed against other parties. No final decree has been entered in the case, and until such decree is entered how can it possibly be known- that this refusal has .prejudiced appellants’ rights? It may be that decree will accomplish, without appellants’ intervention, precisely what they claim ought to be done. The order is clearly interlocutory, and therefore not the subject of an appeal. Racine and Mississippi R. R. Co. v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Co. 70 Ill.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Racine & Mississippi Railroad v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees v. TimponeIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Pfeiffer v. KemperAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API