Legal Opinion

Marshall, Philip v. Curran, Paul

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 7, 2022No. 3:22-cv-00439Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN PHILIP MARSHALL, Plaintiff, OPINION and ORDER v. 22-cv-439-jdp HONORABLE JUDGE PAUL CURRAN, Defendant. Pro se plaintiff Philip Marshall is a patient at the Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center following a civil commitment trial under

Wis. Stat. § 980

et seq. Marshall seeks relief under Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). Marshall alleges that defendant Curran, a state judge, discriminated against him at his civil commitment trial and another proceeding because of his hearing disability. The court granted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arnett v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Jaros v. Illinois Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Johnathan Lacy v. Cook County, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Baribeau v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Brown v. WattersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API