Legal Opinion

People v. Mutual Benefit Associates

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886Published

Appeal by Angus McDonald, late receiver of tlie Mutual Benefit Associates, the defendant, from an order of the Monroe Special Term, so far as it fixed the amount of bis commissions as such receiver.

1Opinion of the Court

Bradley, J.:

The appellant having been appointed receiver of the Mutual Benefit Associates in this action, and after having proceeded some time in the execution of the trust, tendered to the court his resignation. And a referee was appointed to take and state his final account, who made his report by which it appeared that the receiver *50was charged with the sum of $L0,617.90, as the total amount of funds that had come to his hands as such, which was reduced by credits against it to $1,689.82; that the receiver had reassessed members in the United States $73,757.23, and in Canada $5,844.32, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Laytin v. . DavidsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Schenck v. . DartNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Cairns v. ChaubertNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
  4. In Matter of Assignment of HulburtNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Devendorf v. BeardsleyNew York Supreme Court · 1857

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API