Legal Opinion
Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided September 28, 1999No. 98-2043PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, November 12, 1999. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, December 13, 1999. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, December 30, 1999. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.
2Cited by12 opinions
- Douglas W. Schwenk v. James Hartford Steve Sinclair Robert Mitchell,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- State v. LetourneauCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- United States v. Truriel B. NathanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Hartson Partnership v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Kleven v. City of Des MoinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.