Legal Opinion
Crue v. Aiken
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided April 6, 2001No. 01-1144PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, District Judge.
This matter is now before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) enjoining the University of Illinois (the “University”) from requiring the preclearance of communications with prospective student athletes by two proposed classes of putative Plaintiffs. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [# 4] is GRANTED.
I. JURISDICTION
The jurisdiction of the Court arises pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1831, as the matter presents a case or controversy arising under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
II.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McWaters v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2006
- Bianca Lace Merritt-Wilson v. New American Funding, LLC, Broker Solutions, Inc., d/b/a New American Funding, MDK Legal, Edward Ralph Peterka, Zachariah Lee Manchester, Scott D. Smith, Lindsey Everhart Reese, Intercounty Judicial Sales Corporation, Hon. Stacey L. Campbell, in her official capacity, and Does 1-50District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2025
- Church of the American Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. City of GaryDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2002
- Draper v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2020
- EASi, LLC v. GaffarDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2020
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.