Legal Opinion

Daniel G. Ross v. James B. Peake

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided January 8, 2008No. 05-2286Published

1Opinion of the Court

*535ORDER

2Per curiam

On January 2, 2008, the Court issued a panel decision in the above-captioned appeal, affirming a June 20, 2005, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision. See Ross v. Peake, 21 Vet.App. 528, 2008 WL 36825 (Jan. 2, 2008). Prior to the issuance of Ross, two judges requested full-Court consideration. See Court’s Internal Operating Procedures ¶ V(b)(5).

Upon consideration of the foregoing, and there being no majority in favor of the request for full-Court consideration, it is

ORDERED that full-Court consideration is DENIED.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daniel G. Ross v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008