Legal Opinion

Plaisance v. Texaco, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided January 30, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-2645PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNAMARA, District Judge.

Before the court is the Motion of Defendants, Texaco, Inc. and Crosby Marine Service, Inc., to Dismiss Certain Claims Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), or for Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Henry Anthony Plaisance, Jr., oppose this Motion. The Motion, set to be heard on Wednesday, January 24, 1990, is before the court on briefs, without oral argument.

Defendants move this court to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims that are attributable to emotional injury, arguing that Plaintiffs have not stated a cause of action under either the Jones Act or under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William Hagerty v. L & L Marine Services, Inc., and Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Roger Gaston v. Flowers Transportation, (Cro-Marine Division, a Division of Chromalloy American Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mr. & Mrs. Henry Plaisance, Jr. v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Mr. & Mrs. Henry Plaisance, Jr. v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Mr. & Mrs. Henry Plaisance, Jr. v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Mr. & Mrs. Henry Plaisance, Jr. v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Plaisance v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API