People v. Miranda
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
—At the joint preliminary examination of multiple defendants charged with murder and other crimes, the prosecutor sought to admit, as against defendant Luis Miranda and a codefendant, Daniel Morales, the testimony of an investigating officer relating the confession of a nontestifying codefendant, Jose Canela, implicating defendant and Morales in the crimes. Was the officer’s testimony, which probably would have been inadmissible at the defendant’s trial as a violation of the state hearsay rule or state and federal confrontation principles (see Lilly v. Virginia (1999) 527 U.S.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Correa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. HerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Arteaga v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Correa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.