Legal Opinion

Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co. v. Village of Kinney

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 20, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Cleveland Cliffs Iron Company against the Village of Kinney and others to enjoin the holding of an election. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity by the Cleveland Cliffs Iron Company against the village of Kinney and others, to enjoin the defendants from holding an election for the purpose of annexing to the village of Kinney the lands described in the complaint, and from calling an election at any time during the pendency of the action to vote upon said question of annexation, or from taking any action in reference to such election. The bill was filed June 12, 1918. A preliminary injunction was issued on the 15th day of June, 1918. Subsequently the county auditor was made a party…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. State of Wisconsin v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association and Federal Home Loan Bank BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  2. Blackman v. StoneDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1936
  3. Gulick v. LinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Attorney General v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API