Legal Opinion

Adamucci v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 13, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

The appeal in this case is from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and the grounds urged’ for reversal are that the denial of a rule for new trial was an abuse of discretion; that illegal evidence was admitted, and that there was error in the charge of the trial judge to the jury.

Taking up the last point first, the objection to the charge and the denial of certain requests were waived inasmuch as one of the reaspns urged in the rule was that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the charge of the court, and this even though exceptions taken at the trial were reserved in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Decker v. George W. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
  2. Cleaves v. YeskelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API