Legal Opinion
Shawmut Bank, N.A. v. Miller
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 9, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The Millers, guarantors of a note given to the Framingham Trust Company, which has since merged into the plaintiff bank (bank), appeal from a judgment on the note entered against them following allowance of the bank’s motion for summary judgment and the dismissal of the Millers’ counterclaim. 2 We transferred the Millers’ appeal to this court on our own motion and now affirm the judgment. 3
In May, 1987, Miller Furs, Inc., executed a revolving note payable to the plaintiff bank’s predecessor. 4 The note states that Miller Furs promises “to pay, on demand to the [bank] or order ... an amount…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kham & Nate's Shoes No. 2, Inc., Debtor-Appellee v. First Bank of WhitingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Paul Reid and Mary J. Reid v. Key Bank of Southern Maine, Inc., Paul Reid and Mary J. Reid v. Key Bank of Southern Maine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Diversified Foods, Inc. v. First National Bank of BostonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Flagship Nat. Bank v. Gray Distribution Syst.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- NWI International, Inc. v. Edgewood BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Travel Services Network, Inc. v. Presidential Financial Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- McDonald v. Rockland Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Champy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
- Muddy River Investment Corp. v. FaracaMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.