Karanja v. Keisler
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
William MW Angi Karanja, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions this court for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his application for asylum. This court will uphold the finding that an alien is not eligible for asylum if that finding is supported by substantial evidence. Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir.1994).
“To qualify for asylum, an alien must be a ‘refugee.’ ” Tesfamichael v. Gonzales, 469 F.3d 109, 113 (5th Cir.2006) (citing 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a)). A refugee is a person unable to return to his or her country “because of persecution…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zhu Yu Chun v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Sofia Campos-Guardado v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Seyhhmat Ozdemir v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Tesfamichael v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
3Cited by1 opinion
- Morales Lopez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021