Singleton v. Garrett
Mississippi Supreme Court
In error from the circuit court of Wilkinson county; Hon. Stanhope Posey, judge. The facts of the case are sufficiently given in the opinion of the court. Cited 1 Chit. PI. 524-395; Gildart v. Starke, 1 How. 450; Green v. Creighton, 10. S & M. 159 ; Stewart v. Davidson, 10 Ib. 351; Jones v. Coon, 5 Ib. 751; Harper v. Archer, 9 Ib. 74; Campbell v. Brown, 6 How. 114; Stubblefield v. Me Raven, 5 S. & M. 130 ; Carmichael v. Browder, 3 How. 252. Cited Hutch.
Read the full summary
In error from the circuit court of Wilkinson county; Hon. Stanhope Posey, judge. The facts of the case are sufficiently given in the opinion of the court. Cited 1 Chit. PI. 524-395; Gildart v. Starke, 1 How. 450; Green v. Creighton, 10. S & M. 159 ; Stewart v. Davidson, 10 Ib. 351; Jones v. Coon, 5 Ib. 751; Harper v. Archer, 9 Ib. 74; Campbell v. Brown, 6 How. 114; Stubblefield v. Me Raven, 5 S. & M. 130 ; Carmichael v. Browder, 3 How. 252. Cited Hutch. Code, 875, sec. 64; 1 Chit. PI. 318; Steph. PI. 302; Fletcher v. Peck, 2 Cond. (U. S.) R. 316 ; Harrison v. Balfour, 5 S. & M. 301; Baker v.…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Shahicey
This suit was brought by the plaintiff in error, on the administration bond of Garrett, Stewart being a surety, to recover the amount of a distributive share, which had been decreed to plaintiff on a final settlement of the administration accounts. The decree is entirely free from ambiguity. It recites that the final account of the administration on the estate of Hiram Singleton, was presented to the court by Garrett, the administrator, and it appearing that due notice had been given, and no objections being made, the same was examined, allowed, and ordered to be recorded. And it was further…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Lipscomb v. Postell ex rel. Van VacterMississippi Supreme Court · 1860
- Walker v. WoodsMississippi Supreme Court · 1932