Legal Opinion

Gomez v. Lawson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 2, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

This action has been brought to recover damages for the breach of a contract to do certain sand blasting on a granite monument. The trial was by the court, which, after making a finding of the facts, rendered judgment for the plaintiff. The case is before us on exceptions by the defendant.

The following facts were found: The plaintiff, who was a manufacturer of granite monuments in Barre, Vermont, sold a monument to one Banks of Wilkesbarre, Pennsylvania, and entered into a contract with the defendant to place sand blast lines upon the base, the two pilasters and the cap. Under this contract,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robey v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  2. Land Finance Corp. v. St. Johnsbury Wiring Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  3. G. R. Bianchi Granite Co. v. Terre Haute Monument Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  4. McDonald v. McNeilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  5. Massucco v. TomassiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Everett's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  2. F. I. Somers & Sons, Inc. v. LeClercSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API