Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Brookner v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1998No. A081708Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

JONES, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

I concur in part II.A. of the majority opinion. I entirely agree that experience and logic dictate a reexamination of the notion of appointing “advisory” and “standby” counsel in Faretta cases (Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806 [95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562]). However, I part company from my colleagues when they follow the Ligda decision (Ligda v. Superior Court (1970) 5 Cal.App.3d 811 [85 Cal.Rptr. 744]) over Littlefield v. Superior Court (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 856 [22 Cal.Rptr.2d 659], which I consider more persuasive. I do not believe the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Ligda v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Chaleff v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Littlefield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Littlefield v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API