Legal Opinion

Carino v. Insular Government of Philippine Islands

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 23, 1909No. 72PublishedCited by 32 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE . ISLANDS. The facts are stated in the. opinion. ---The Land Registration Court had jurisdiction of the subject-matter under act No. 496, §§ 2,19; and its decision was legal, just arid in conformity with the protection of private property provision of the Treaty of Paris. Public-Land Act, No. 926. This court has jurisdiction and writ of error is the proper method.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE . ISLANDS. The facts are stated in the. opinion. ---The Land Registration Court had jurisdiction of the subject-matter under act No. 496, §§ 2,19; and its decision was legal, just arid in conformity with the protection of private property provision of the Treaty of Paris. Public-Land Act, No. 926. This court has jurisdiction and writ of error is the proper method. The proceeding is one in rem and not in personam as it deals with titles to real estate. See § 705, Rev. Stat.; 27 Stat. 434; 31 Stat.-1189,1227; Ormsby v. Webb, 134 U. S. 47; Met.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This was an application to the Philippine Court of Land Registration for the registration of certain land. The application was granted by the court on March 4, 1904. An appeal was taken to the Court of First Instance of the Province of Benguet, on behalf of the Government of the Philippines and also on behalf of the United States, those Governments having taken possession of the property for public and military purposes. The Court of First Instance found the facts and dismissed the application upon grounds of law. This judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court, 7 Philippine, 132, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Railroad v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Ormsby v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Campbell v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. BrowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. The Western MaidSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Ex parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Levis Leon Aldrich v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API