Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Brentwater Homes, Inc. v. Weibley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1977No. 344Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEagen, Justice

I am unable to agree with Mr. Justice Pomeroy that appellees have met their burden of establishing fraud with evidence that is sufficiently clear, precise, and convincing.

The record does not support the chancellor’s finding that Mr. Keeley assured appellees that he planned to build only single-family homes on the tract in question. Neither Mr. nor Mrs. Weibley testified to this clearly and unequivocally, although both were given opportunities to do so. For example:

[Mr. Weibley, on cross-examination]

“Q. Did Mr. Keeley ever promise you that he was going to build only single family residences ?
“A…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Universal Builders, Inc. v. Moon Motor Lodge, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Payne v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Shapiro v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Snow v. Corsica Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Carlson v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API