Legal Opinion

Consolidated Premium Iron Ores, Ltd. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 23, 1957No. Docket Nos. 47893, 54352, 54396Published

1. Where individual petitioners at all times acted as agents or representatives of certain corporations existing or to be formed, they were not liable personally or in their individual capacity for income arising from the bargain purchase of stock of one corporation by a second corporation. 2. Under the Tax Convention and Protocol between the United States and Canada, where a Canadian corporation did not engage in trade or business within the United States and did not have a…

Read the full summary

1. Where individual petitioners at all times acted as agents or representatives of certain corporations existing or to be formed, they were not liable personally or in their individual capacity for income arising from the bargain purchase of stock of one corporation by a second corporation. 2. Under the Tax Convention and Protocol between the United States and Canada, where a Canadian corporation did not engage in trade or business within the United States and did not have a "permanent establishment" therein, such corporation is not liable to the United States for taxes on the income of such…

1Opinion of the Court

Consolidated Premium Iron Ores Limited, et al., * Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Consolidated Premium Iron Ores, Ltd. v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 47893, 54352, 54396

United States Tax Court

28 T.C. 127; 1957 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 212;

April 23, 1957, Filed

Decisions will be entered under Rule 50.

1. Where individual petitioners at all times acted as agents or representatives of certain corporations existing or to be formed, they were not liable personally or in their individual capacity for income arising from the bargain purchase of stock of one corporation by a second…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Helvering v. EubankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Lewellyn v. Pittsburgh, B. & L. E. R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  5. Herbert v. RiddellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API