Legal Opinion
CHD, Inc. v. Boyles
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 19, 2007No. 24550-1-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*134¶1 A party waives the right to contest the underlying obligations on property in a foreclosure proceeding when there is no attempt to use the presale remedies in RCW 61.24.130. In re Marriage of Kaseburg, 126 Wn. App. 546, 558, 108 P.3d 1278 (2005). Virginia Boyles sought a nonjudicial foreclosure on a trust deed granted by CHD, Inc., to secure a promissory note. After receiving notice but before the trustee sale, CHD brought a declaratory action to contest the underlying debt based on a statute of limitations defense. CHD did not attempt to enjoin the sale. Ms. Boyles proceeded with the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Plein v. LackeyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Hiatt v. Walker Chevrolet Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Plein v. LackeyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- C 1031 Properties, Inc. v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Colorado Structures, Inc. v. Blue Mountain Plaza, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Albice v. PREMIER MORTG. SERVICES OF WASH.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Albice v. Premier Mortgage Services of Washington, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Merry v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.