Legal Opinion

Levine v. Hegeman Transfer & Lighterage Terminal, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 13, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

This case was tried with the companion case of Samuel Kaufman against the same defendants. The matters discussed in that case are equally applicable here, with a single exception. The prohibition of recovery for failure to have a motor-vehicle registered is limited to the owner of the vehicle by the provisions of Chapter 400, § 61, of the Public Acts of 1921. Prior to the Act of 1917, the same prohibition applied equally to the operator of the motor-vehicle and the passenger in the motor-vehicle. The present statute does not bar the plaintiff passenger from recovery for the failure of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shea v. CorbettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wise v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API