Legal Opinion

Wieszeck v. Sepessy

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 31, 1976No. 7174PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

The plaintiff, Emil S. Wieszeck, was the driver of an automobile which collided with a car operated by the defendant on June 2, 1966, in Salem, New Hampshire. He brought one action for damages arising from his personal injuries and, with his wife, a second action for the damage to their car. The two actions were tried together by a jury before Morris, J. The plaintiffs received a verdict of $50,000 in the first action and $1,372.70 in the second.

On the issue of the plaintiff’s duty to exercise ordinary care, the defendant excepted to the court’s charge and to the court’s refusal to charge as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bentley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  3. Ratay v. LiuSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Bentley v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1956
  5. Currier v. Grossman's of New Hampshire, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BreestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  2. State v. LaPlumeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  3. London v. PerreaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API