Teller v. Willis
Michigan Supreme Court
■ Motion to dismiss a writ of error issued more than two years after judgment rendered.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell J.:
Where a writ of error is not brought until after two years from the date of judgment, we think it a more convenient practice, in a Court like ours, with no ready facilities for jury trials, not to require the defendant in error to plead the limitation, until there is some responsible showing that the plaintiff in error comes within some of the saving clauses. If upon a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, made on the first reasonable opportunity, the plaintiff shows himself by affidavit to come within the exceptions, the Court can resort to such measures as may be found…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Riley v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Bliss v. Caille Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909