Legal Opinion
Currie v. Melton
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 19, 1936No. 1566PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRISSOM, Justice.
This is a suit by T. S. Currie against S. A. Melton and Cora Holmes on two promissory notes signed by said defendants payable to the order of A. L. Wasson and duly assigned to Currie. The cause was tried without a jury and judgment rendered in favor of Currie against Melton, but judgment against Cora Holmes was denied.
It is undisputed that Cora Holmes was a married woman at the time she signed the notes; that she was not joined by her husband, in their execution; that Currie knew such facts when he bought the notes. Mr. Currie and Mrs. Holmes were the only witnesses. Mrs.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Red River National Bank v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1918
- Gamel v. City Nat. Bank of Colorado Tex.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Schenck v. Foster Building & Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Aiken v. First Nat. Bank of BridgeportCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Jesse H. Jones & Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Service Parts Co. v. BizzellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Keith v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- John F. Grant Lumber Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941